I would hardly call that "decrying" an appointment, it was stupid faux-racist jackassery. Even highlighting it on this blog seems to give it to much credit.
A 'funny' or 'satirical' letter? Uh, yeah, sure, except it wasn't funny and far from satirical (read the theonion.com if you're not sure what satire is, guys). How fast can you backpedal? I'm glad that the outrage on Dartmouth was enough to make the appropriate apologies...
1. That the blitz was just a satirical email meant to be taken as an extreme joke and that publicly decrying it is discrediting Dartmouth as a whole.
2. racist comments are extremely offensive and distasteful regarding of the motive behind them.
and as a Korean, call me biased, but I'm for 2. Doesn't matter if it was written as a joke. Call my sense of humor limited but I bet my life that if this email had been written as it had been, targeted against an African American president, there would have been MAJOR public attention shed on the "simple" email blitz.
The Korean would disagree. A well-done racist joke, coming out of the right persons with the requisite skills, can be a source of great entertainment. The Korean is a purveyor of stand-up comedy, and racial stereotype jokes, done right, are a fantastic source of laughs that gave careers to many talented comedians. (e.g. Richard Pryor, Chris Rock.)
Of course, it clearly requires a lot of skills to pull off a successful racist joke, which these Dartmouth students clearly lacked. It seems that they were trying this type of joke, and failed miserably at that.
I think the problem was they tried too many things.. satire or parody requires a fine touch and these guys were tossing in bad pronunciation jokes, cheap immigrant jokes and the "immigrants" take over jokes (the last two don't make sense in the same place at the same time), food and movie jokes.
The Onion joke works because it is pointed and focuses on one clever idea, it doesn't throw two handfuls of crap at the wall to see what sticks.
You do your "humor" like this and you should expect to be called dumb, at best, and racist at worst.
As the editor-in-chief of Ask a Korean!, the Korean reserves the right to do whatever the hell he damn well pleases with this blog. But by and large, the Korean will follow this policy:
Once the Korean receives your email, he will decide whether it should be answered privately in a reply email, or publicly through a blog post. The Korean tries to answer private emails within a week.
For emails that deserve a post, the Korean answers them in the order received. Thanks to all of your questions and support, the delay is very long -- at least several months, possibly over a year.
The Korean accepts questions ONLY through email. Any question asked on the message boards will be ignored. This will ensure that the questions are answered in the order received.
If your question is particularly time-sensitive, let the Korean know and he will consider bumping the email up the line. The Korean may also answer questions that he finds particularly compelling ahead of their turns.
Please remember the following points when asking the Korean:
1. You are writing an email with a question to a blog that publicly gives answers. You never know which one the Korean would answer publicly. Although the Korean will not reveal any personal information, please write with caution.
2. Please check your spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Bad English really annoys the Korean, and he will frequently ignore poorly written questions. Exceptions are made for those who do not use English as the first language.
3. Search the blog before asking. The Korean so far answered thousands of questions, and hundreds of them are on this blog. There is a good chance that someone asked your question previously.
4. Your answer will only be as good as your question. If you don't want a broad, generic answer, don't ask a broad, generic question.
5. Please give your first name or a hilarious pen name. Otherwise, you will be called "Anonymous Coward".
Thank you for the questions!
About Me
the Korean
The Korean is currently living in New York. He was born and raised in Korea until he was 16; then his family moved to Los Angeles area (Cerritos, CA). The Korean went to four years of college in the SF Bay Area before making the cross-continental trip. The Korean is pretty well versed in Korean history, politics, and sociology, which makes him (kinda) qualified to answer your questions. He promises to do his best.
Send your emails to AskAKorean@hotmail.com.
5 COMMENTS:
I would hardly call that "decrying" an appointment, it was stupid faux-racist jackassery. Even highlighting it on this blog seems to give it to much credit.
A 'funny' or 'satirical' letter? Uh, yeah, sure, except it wasn't funny and far from satirical (read the theonion.com if you're not sure what satire is, guys). How fast can you backpedal? I'm glad that the outrage on Dartmouth was enough to make the appropriate apologies...
there seems to be two arguements here...
1. That the blitz was just a satirical email meant to be taken as an extreme joke and that publicly decrying it is discrediting Dartmouth as a whole.
2. racist comments are extremely offensive and distasteful regarding of the motive behind them.
and as a Korean, call me biased, but I'm for 2. Doesn't matter if it was written as a joke. Call my sense of humor limited but I bet my life that if this email had been written as it had been, targeted against an African American president, there would have been MAJOR public attention shed on the "simple" email blitz.
olsen,
That's why it only got one sentence.
January,
The Korean would disagree. A well-done racist joke, coming out of the right persons with the requisite skills, can be a source of great entertainment. The Korean is a purveyor of stand-up comedy, and racial stereotype jokes, done right, are a fantastic source of laughs that gave careers to many talented comedians. (e.g. Richard Pryor, Chris Rock.)
Of course, it clearly requires a lot of skills to pull off a successful racist joke, which these Dartmouth students clearly lacked. It seems that they were trying this type of joke, and failed miserably at that.
I think the problem was they tried too many things.. satire or parody requires a fine touch and these guys were tossing in bad pronunciation jokes, cheap immigrant jokes and the "immigrants" take over jokes (the last two don't make sense in the same place at the same time), food and movie jokes.
The Onion joke works because it is pointed and focuses on one clever idea, it doesn't throw two handfuls of crap at the wall to see what sticks.
You do your "humor" like this and you should expect to be called dumb, at best, and racist at worst.
Post a Comment