Friday, March 12, 2010

Ask a Korean! News: Ven. Beobjeong Enters Nirvana

Venerable Beobjeong, a major leader of Korean Buddhism, passed away yesterday at age 78. Ven. Beobjeong was not only a man of the highest spirituality and integrity, but also was quite a writer who sought to make the Buddhist way accessible to as many people as possible. He also had a great relationship with the leaders of Korean Catholicism, always striving for religious harmony in Korea.

 Ven. Beobjeong

Here are selected quotes from Ven. Beobjeong, translated:
- We possess things because of need, but sometimes we spend our heart because those things. Therefore, to possess something is to be held into something else. Thus, possessing much means being held as much.

- Flowers; do not take for granted this heart-filling truth that blooms around us. This is an amazing mystery. We must reflect upon human history through the flower's bloom. How much am I blooming the clearest and most beautiful element within myself? We must reflect our own lives through flowers.

- The empty heart is called musim. The empty heart is our true heart. If the heart is filled with something, that is not the true heart. Without emptiness, there is no resonance. Without resonance, life cannot be fresh or energetic.

- Musoyu ("not possessing") does not mean not having anything; rather, it means not having anything unnecessary. The clear poverty that we have chosen is much more valuable and precious than wealth.

- Who am I? Ask yourselves that question. You must ask, ask and ask again until your inner face emerges and shows itself. Do not ask cursorily, but ask desperately with the voice within your voice, against the ear within your ear. The answer lies within that question.

-There are two ways in Buddhist training. The way of wisdom, through which the self is formed; and the way of mercy, through which your neighbors are warmly cared for. If either one is missing, it is not Buddhism, nor is it religion.  Every religion has these two elements. A religious life entails care for others at the same time.
Ven. Beobjeong always stressed the importance of musoyu ("not possessing"). His last words were true to his teaching:
You will absolutely not kill any precious trees for any grand cremation ceremony, and  do not waste money on new cloth for new burial clothes. There’s leftover firewood that I already gathered at my mountain hut. Cremate me there by the rocks where I used to meditate. Scatter my ashes on the ground where the azaleas graciously bloomed each spring. That will be my final recompense.
Accordingly, as you can see from the picture below, the body of Ven. Beobjeong was not put in a casket, but was simply laid on top of the low table on which he used to sit, and was covered by his overcoat.

 
There is not any need to speak the trite words, "Rest in peace." He had long attained peace while he was alive, and his passing is no more than that -- passing, and continuation of his spiritual life.

(Some information via Marmot's Hole)

Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Here is something for Korean movie fans: Interview in English with Bong Joon-Ho, he of The Host fame -- with a slightly twisted answer toward the end.

(Via Korea Beat)

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

This is cool -- one of the flight attendants who subdued the Christmas day underpants bomber in Detroit is a Korean American named Richard Cho, who received a thank you letter from Barack Obama for his heroics.

Ask a Korean! News: Epic Battle between Ultraman and Koreanmomzilla

Interesting discussion over tradition between the Korean and the Korean Mother. Well, it would have been interesting if it did not involve hours of screaming into the phone.

The Korean was planning to have the traditional portion of the wedding (폐백 or pyebaek) in Korea after the wedding in New York, because the ceremony is for the 시댁 (si-daek, i.e. the groom's family) to welcome the bride. For the Korean, the proper 시댁 is in Korea, where heads of his extended family -- namely, the Korean Grandmother and the Korean Uncle (큰아버지) -- are located. For the Korean Mother (who recently morphed into Koreanmomzilla,) the proper 시댁 is wherever the Korean Mother and the Korean Father are located, which means 폐백 has to be a part of the New York wedding.

An epic battle between Ultraman and Koreanmomzilla just happened, which sort of looked like this...


(Source)

... but just imagine the two duking it out on the phone instead of breathing fires and shooting laser beams.

But in the end, the noble Ultraman was defeated, and Koreanmomzilla stomped on his cold dead body. Now the Korean has to go look for a separate room in the reception space for the goddamn 폐백. Losing never feels good, even if it's losing to your mom.

What do you think is the proper result?

Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.

Tuesday, March 09, 2010

A very popular New York Times article this week is about people trying to find a way to build a better teacher. The entire article is very much worth a read. One passage in the article caught the Korean's eyes:
When Doug Lemov conducted his own search for those magical ingredients, he noticed something about most successful teachers that he hadn’t expected to find: what looked like natural-born genius was often deliberate technique in disguise. “Stand still when you’re giving directions,” a teacher at a Boston school told him. In other words, don’t do two things at once. Lemov tried it, and suddenly, he had to ask students to take out their homework only once.
Building a Better Teacher (New York Times)

The Korean does not know if his reaction is based on the fact that he is a Korean, or that he is a son of two very successful teachers. At any rate, the Korean's reaction was: People don't know this?

The Korean volunteers frequently at a NYC public school, and he has always been one of the most effective volunteers in getting a classroom full of high school students under control and follow his directions. The manner in which the Korean does that has always been very obvious to the Korean - strong voice, squared shoulders, locked hips, determined glare. It is how you are supposed to project authority. It is, to the Korean, as natural as breathing. Did the Korean somehow come to pick up a skill that a majority of people do not?

Monday, March 08, 2010

AAK! Music: Mackerel by Lucid Fall (2009)

This band probably won't make the top-50, but is nonetheless one of the Korean's favorite. Today's selection is Mackerel (고등어) by Lucid Fall (루시드폴).



고등어
Mackerel

어디로든 갈 수 있는 튼튼한 지느러미로
With the strong fin that can go anywhere
나를 원하는 곳으로 헤엄치네
I swim to where I am wanted
돈이 없는 사람들도 배불리 먹을 수 있게
For the people without money can too be full
나는 또 다시 바다를 가르네
I again sail the sea

몇 만원이 넘는다는 서울의 꽃등심보다
I hear sirloin steaks of Seoul cost over several tens of thousands of won
맛도 없고 비린지는 몰라도
I may be less tasty and fishier than that
그래도 나는 안다네 그 동안 내가 지켜온 수 많은 가족들의 저녁 밥상
But I know the numberless families' dinner table that I protected so far


나를 고를 때면 내 눈을 바라봐줘요
When you are picking me, please look into my eyes
나는 눈을 감는 법도 몰라요
I don't even know how to close them
가난한 그대 날 골라줘서 고마워요
You without money, thank you for picking me
수고했어요 오늘 이 하루도
You did good again today

나를 고를 때면 내 눈을 바라봐줘요
When you are picking me, please look into my eyes
나는 눈을 감는 법도 몰라요
I don't even know how to close them
가난한 그대 날 골라줘서 고마워요
You without money, thank you for picking me
수고했어요 오늘 이 하루도
You did good again today

나를 고를 때면 내 눈을 바라봐줘요
When you are picking me, please look into my eyes
나는 눈을 감는 법도 몰라요
I don't even know how to close them
가난한 그대 날 골라줘서 고마워요
You without money, thank you for picking me
수고했어요 오늘 이 하루도
You did good again today

수고했어요 오늘 이 하루도
You did good again today


Briefly about Lucid Fall:  Lucid Fall is a one-man band by Cho Yun-Seok. Lucid Fall released its first album in 2001, but Cho actually debuted with a different band in 1998, which was disbanded after most of its members went to serve their military duty. Cho operated his band while keeping his day job, which is being a scientist in material science and bioengineering. Cho earned his bachelor's degree from Seoul National University, masters from Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden and doctorate from Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. He patented a new material for medicine through his doctorate thesis in 2008. However, in 2009 Cho announced that he will no longer pursue engineering and focus solely on music. Lucid Fall has four regular albums, a couple of singles and a movie soundtrack.

About this song:  Mackerel is the title song of Lucid Fall's fourth and most recent album, titled "Les Miserables."

Translation note:   몇 만원이 넘는다는 / 서울의 꽃등심보다 / 맛도 없고 비린지는 몰라도 / 그래도 나는 안다네 / 그 동안 내가 지켜온 / 수 많은 가족들의 저녁 밥상 is very elegant, but the Korean's translation is anything but. "--다는" is particularly difficult to translate in an equivalent manner. (That is, equivalent in rhythm as well as in meaning.)

The Korean on Lucid Fall:  Relaxed melodies with slightly disturbing lyrics. Dangerous if listened to while feeling depressed. At times, seems as if determined to write the most depressing series of songs ever. Not innovative, but intelligent and does one thing very well.

Significance in K-Pop History:  (1 = instantly forgettable; 5 = popular at the time, ultimately forgettable; 10 = transcendental history-maker)  4.5 out of 10.

Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com

Saturday, March 06, 2010

Ask a Korean! Wiki: Submit Your K-Pop Pantheon

Dear readers,

Now that he started a music corner on AAK!, the Korean is on a roll. Now the Korean wants to have a gigantic AAK! music series that showcases the most hallowed members of K-Pop -- the K-Pop Pantheon, if you will. Essentially, the series will discuss the top-25 (or 30, or 50, or whatever the Korean ends up deciding,) musicians/bands in K-pop history in order. Like everything else on this blog, this series is guaranteed to be arbitrary and capricious to the Korean's whim. But the Korean wishes to have at least some semblance of reason, and that is where you come in.

Submit your very own K-pop Pantheon! In doing so, please consider the overall picture instead of just submitting the people you like. While you can employ whatever criteria you want, here are some criteria to guide your thoughts with:

- Sheer ability: Does the artist have incredible voice (example: Lee So-Ra) or the ability to constantly churn out popular music over a long time? (Example: Yoo Yeong-Seok.)

- Artistry:  Is the artist innovative or original in his/her music and/or presentation? (Example:  Jaurim.)

- Genre-defining/leading:  Did the artist create a genre? (Example:  Shin Joong-Hyeon.) Is the artist essentially synonymous with the genre? (Example: Song Dae-Gwan.) Is the artist so far ahead of everyone else in the genre? (Example: Seo Taiji.) Perfected an archetype of a genre? (Example:  H.O.T.)

- Popular appeal:  Did the artist completely dominate an era? (Example: Cho Yong-Pil.) Was the artist simply everywhere in Korean pop culture for a time? (Example: Lee Hyo-Ri.) Is the artist staying in the public consciousness for a very long time, for whatever reason? (Example:  Shin Hae-Cheol.) Does the artist dominate a certain segment of the population? (Example:  Jang Gi-Ha.)

- Social impact:  Did the artist change the society around him/her, through his/her music or otherwise? (Example: Kim Min-Gi.)

- Cultural reflection:  Does the artist serve as the epitome of the society around him/her? (Example:  Kim Gwang-Seok.)

- Historical perspective:  Is the more recent artist getting overvalued at the cost of the more classic artist?  (Example:  Picking Girls' Generation over Sanullim.)

The Korean is doing this so that he does not miss anyone significant. Mad props will be given to those who include artists from pre-1990s K-pop. Also, feel free to accompany the names with the most representative song for the artist. (Here is an example: Regret of the Times (시대유감) for Seo Taiji. Discuss.)

Also, please tell your k-pop loving friends! The Korean really wants to have the most comprehensive list possible. Burn down the comment thread!!

Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.

Friday, March 05, 2010

Ask a Korean! News: The Korean is a Wanted Man

Well, here is someone who -- pursuant to the Korean's earlier admonition -- needs to go fuck him/herself.

One note: The writer of that gawdawful post initially claimed that the Korean's post cited surveys that did not exist. The Korean demanded that to be corrected, and now that portion reads even more ridiculous. The writer thinks that the survey, conducted by Korean Society of Food and Nutrition, is a malicious lie spread by the vast, dog-meat-eating conspiracy because one Korean guy thinks it's a lie. Classic.

-EDIT 3/6/2010- Oh, this is so great. The cowards at KARA put up this notice on the article:
NOTICE

Due to abuses, commenting for Member Articles has been disabled. This is an information portal, not a forum for pro-meat rants or a blog where anything goes.

Any accounts and comments made that are deemed to be not by GENUINE advocates of animal rights (i.e. those directed here from the Ask a Korean blog site) will be deleted. Direct any complaints to admin at animalrightskorea.org

Please note that all items in the Member Articles section are written by KARA English site members and represent their uncensored opinions. If you have other opinions not supporting animal rights, you will need to express them elsewhere in the appropriate forum. Thank you for your understanding.
Unlike KARA, non-genuine advocates of dog eating are all welcome on AAK! Yes, even those who think other people should not eat dog meat. The Korean will tell them to go fuck themselves, but they are still welcome to come and comment, either here or on the original post. Heck, the Korean even responded to one of the objections on the original post.

Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.

Thursday, March 04, 2010

This is terrific news:
Nine people had paid $100 each to learn how to raise, kill and butcher the animals. One was a woman hoping to start a farm in the Bronx. Another was considering a move to family land in Montana. A couple dressed in black had traveled from the Upper East Side with their knives and cutting boards in an Abercrombie & Fitch bag.

...

As the pre-slaughter lecture in Brooklyn began, Ms. Carpenter prepared students for the moment.

“Today is a somber day because we are going to be killing rabbits,” she said. “But I am always psyched after slaughter because I’m like, now I’m going to eat.”

The rabbit events appealed to the kind of adventurous cook who signs up for weekend sausage-making classes, in part because rabbits are an especially good way to learn basic home butchery.
Don’t Tell the Kids (New York Times)

The Korean always thought Americans were too divorced from the process through which their food came to them, which led to -- among other things -- confusing the relative placements of humans and animals, being disrespectful of their food, etc. Killing the animal that you will eat (or, in the very least, seeing it die,) certainly gives you a heightened appreciation for the food that you eat. This should be a required course at school.

Wednesday, March 03, 2010

Ask a Korean! News: Currency Reform in North Korea (Part 2)

(Continued from Part 1 of the series. Original article in Korean here.)

Mission: Impossible, and North Korea's Utter Failure

There is little possibility that prohibition on foreign currency use, issued as a follow-up to the currency reform, would continue to be implemented. (*In fact, as of February North Korea gave up on the enforcement of the prohibition.) North Koreans who possess foreign currency right now are simply sitting on it, waiting for the time when the exchange rate stabilizes. (*The same today, which is about two months since this article was written.) They absolutely do not think that it would be impossible to use foreign currency in the future.

Another North Korean sources said on January 8: "It has been more than a month since the currency reform, but even today the exchange rate goes up and down by 100 percent so it is impossible to know the exact exchange rate," and added: "It will not be until March when the exchange rate between North Korean money and foreign currency would stabilize. Right now there are few transactions." (*The fluctuation in exchange rate is still great enough to cast doubt as to whether the exchange rate will stabilize in March. The stabilization may come in April.) To this reporter who raised doubt about the possibility of being able to continue using foreign currency under the regime's control, the source boasted: "There is no problem at all. It is not as if we have been using foreign currency because the government told us to use it."

The vast majority of North Koreans who are sitting on foreign currency is party officials. The officers who should be in charge of control are actually the ones who most desire the foreign currency ban to be ineffectual. Therefore, it seems likely that the power of dollar and yuan in North Korea will remain strong. (*This prediction by the North Korean source is proving to be very wise at this point.)

國際先驅導報, a Chinese daily, reported on January 7 that Joseon Trade Bank, North Korea's bank that clears trades, set the exchange rate between dollar and the new currency at 96.9 won per dollar. But North Korea's externally posted exchange rate is meaningless. Customarily so far, the exchange rate between dollar and yuan in North Korean black markets was nearly the same as that in China. In other words, if a dollar is exchanged for 6.8 yuan in China, the same rate holds in North Korea.

In addition, even the currency exchange counters in various regions that are run by the government exchanges foreign currency based on the exchange rate in the marketplace. In other words, the externally posted exchange rate is literally for show; even the regime itself does not recognize that exchange rate internally. (*Recently there has been a report where a high-ranking North Korean official admitted to this. There is no need for Korean media to even discuss North Korea's official exchange rate.)

Interesting thing to note is that the value of foreign currency in North Korea tends to go together with the price of rice, which serves as the standard for the value of goods in the marketplace. The rice price, in turn, goes together with the price of rice in the regions of China close to North Korea. Although there is a seasonal factor, usually rice in a North Korean marketplace costs around 1.2 times the cost in China, reflecting the cost of transportation.

The currency reform devalued the money 100 to 1, but it is likely that the reform will become ineffective and the price of goods will revert to the price previous to the reform. (*Even after 100-to-1 devaluation, the price of goods has already climbed to 25 percent of pre-reform price.) For example, right before the reform, rice cost 2200 won for 1 kg and 1 dollar was 3800 won in old money. According to the spirit of the currency reform, 1 kg of rice should be 22 won and 1 dollar should be 38 won in new money. But only one month since the currency reform, 1 kg of rice sells at 200 won and 1 dollar exchanges for over 100 won. (*At mid-February, two months since the reform, 1 kg of rice sells for 500 won in northern North Korea.) Because everyone is hiding their foreign currency in the face of foreign currency prohibition, the exchange rates for dollars or yuans are fluctuating by hundred percent in the same day.

At this point, the marketplace continues to operate as it did before the currency reform. While they have no choice but to show up at marketplace in order to eat and survive, the merchants and the people are confused by the price that runs on a roller coaster several times a day. As the regime decided to pay the laborers the same face value of salary as it was before the reform, the price will likely continue to rise. (*This is actually happening.)

The merchants at the marketplace are the ones who are harmed the most by the currency reform, but farmers on the other hand received the most benefit. Some farmers find themselves rich overnight because of North Korean farms' distribution system. Unlike laborers who receive a monthly salary, farmers receive their entire year's worth of compensation in cash around December through the distribution process. The distribution amount differs depending on one's "effort count".

An "effort count" is a numerical count of the daily labor performed by a farmer. The distribution amount, following the effort count, also depends on the amount of production each farm generated. Therefore, taking North Korea as a whole, a farmer family receives anywhere between several tens of thousand won to several million won. Last December when the farmers received their distribution was when the price for grain and goods, counted in new money, was the lowest. Farmers who anticipated the exacerbating inflation and the rise in price attempted to turn their entire distribution money into goods and sit on them.

This atmosphere is vividly reflected on the January 3rd report by Joseon Shinbo, the official newsletter for North Korean-Japanese Association [TK: 조총련], which described the throng of people at Pyongyang Department Store No. 1. According to the report, the department store spent a week from December 22, 2009 to procure 440 types of items, four million items total, in preparation for the New Year's Day. It must have been a significant strain on the regime to procure this much. But because of the size of the crowd on the morning of the New Year's Day, the department store opened at 7:30 a.m. instead of its normal time, 10 a.m. Just in the morning, 155 televisions and 550 sheets of blankets were sold.

The newsletter said, "There were so many customers that there was hardly room to take a step in the department store. The store at one point had to cordon off the entrance around 3 p.m. because the crowd was simply too big." It added, "There are high-earning families among farmers or miners." It also added, "Lee Geum-Ok, a farmer in Hyeongje-san District, said she received 50,000 won in distribution, and she along with all the farmers in her unit will buy a color television." Also noted is "One farmer who visited the department store that day said his entire family worked at the farm and earned 1.45 million won as a family."

Farmers are convinced that within a few months, the price of goods that they purchased will jump by several times or several tens of times. In fact, except for a few government-run stores in Pyongyang, the price of goods at the marketplace is furiously rising every day. (*The farmers' actions are proving to be a wise move. The farmers who immediately sat on goods with their distribution money made a significant gain.)

The price rises in large part because of stockpiling, not simply by farmers but by everyone. There are many who support the currency reform among those who are able to stockpile. But they do not necessarily expect things to continue to be better simply because their life right now has improved a little. Stockpiling is a reflection of that mindset; they believe that actual goods are much safer than the untrustworthy North Korean money. Because the wholesalers are keeping their goods in warehouses, and regular people are stockpiling what little goods that the regime procures or the grain that come out into the marketplace, the shortage in North Korea is increasingly getting worse. This feeds into the vicious cycle that leads into the rise in price.

Therefore, unless the North Korean regime finds an ingenious way to pull out the goods that individuals are hiding, the social unrest can only grow. Right now the regime is trying to forcibly cut off the supply chain of individually-owned goods by eliminating the marketplace, but that measure has little possibility of success. (*As expected, it has been proven that there was no real ingenious way, and the situation ended with North Korea simply recognizing the presence of the marketplace.) North Korean people, through their experience from the last decade, know that a transaction can happen regardless of time and place as long as they hold the goods.

This round of currency reform also provided South Korea with certain food for thought.

Shortly after the news of currency reform broke, South Korean media was flooded with the sensationalistic news as if riots were impending in North Korea. However, this reporter who investigated North Korea at the same time heard that the public opinion on the currency reform was in fact significantly favorable. Despite this, the media that relayed the currency reform news only contained the voices of angry North Koreans. (*As I said previously, the favorable opinion has changed in the last month and a half.)

Of course, there could be legitimate reasons. The North Koreans who can speak on the phone with South Korea are likely to be the victims of the currency reform. It is reasonable to infer from their ability to communicate with South Korea that they received a lot of money in the process as well. But even more so than these reasons, this reporter detected the prejudice in South Korea that, "North Korea regime can never do anything that may be welcomed by the people, nor should it."

The news of currency reform was relayed mainly through North Korea-related NGOs that engage in anti-Kim Jong-Il activities. It is difficult to blame a politically motivated group for publicizing only the information that is necessarily for their goal. (*Naturally.) But I believe that the media should not jump into that fray, looking only for sensationalistic stories. As long as it was sensational, a report by a nameless Taiwanese media company -- which Korean companies did not even glance at, and has nothing to do with North Korea -- would be quoted in the front page of Korean newspaper and the main story of Korean television news. (*To give a neologism name, it is a typical pingpong reportage.) Truly embarrassing.

Another interesting point is that it is getting increasingly more difficult for the traditional media to maintain its lead in North Korea-related news. In the Internet age when an individual could be a one-man media through such channels as blogs, the traditional media's advantage is disappearing. North Korea's currency reform starkly exemplified this trend. North Korea-related organizations poured out news related to the currency reform, and the traditional media did no more than following them and taking notes.

In contrast, it was the North Korea-related organizations who were engaged in a competition to break news. While these groups sometimes provided incorrect information due to excessive competition, lack of experience and understanding with the press, their political leanings, etc., more notable was that South Korean media does not have the ability to sufficiently distinguish the worthy North Korean news from the worthless ones. (*There were actual examples of simply taking dictations of information that was hardly credible.)

The reportage on the currency reform was also a symbolic moment of the presence of North Korean defector organization, while providing an occasion to question the ability of government agencies (run with a massive budget) to collect North Korean intelligence. While the defector organizations made reports on real time basis, the government only repeated for several days that it could not confirm. There were also reports that Intelligence Committee of the National Assembly continued to chastise the lack of intelligence gathering in North Korea. While the defector organization cannot yet collect much high-level intelligence, it is undeniable that their information-gathering power is increasing.

This reporter tried to avoid listing the current price in North Korea in this article. The price fluctuation and the regional differences in price are so great that, at this point, there is no such thing as a fair price. (*This situation is the same in February.) The North Koreans who were reported unanimously say: "Right now we just have no idea about what's what."

Truly, North Korea has now entered into chaos that North Koreans themselves have difficulty understanding. Even after more than a month since the reform, there is no sign of this chaos abating. (*At this point, three months after the reform, North Korea regime unconditionally allowed the marketplace to open in order to calm this chaos. In the end, the only solution for the chaos was to go back to where things were before the reform.)

That is the magnitude of the shock that the currency reform caused on North Korea. Can the North Korean regime stabilize this chaos and restore planned economy? Taking away the taste of market economy from those who already tasted them may be a Mission: Impossible. (*Conclusion -- Within three months, it has been proven that North Korea made an impossible challenge. It has also been proven that now, North Korea can never return to the planned and controlled economy.)

Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.

Monday, March 01, 2010

Affirmative Action and Asian Americans: the Korean's Take

Dear Korean,

Perhaps you’ve already seen this, but I found this column interesting. I wondered what your thoughts are on this.

Kimberly


Dear Kimberly,

Thank you for the article – the Korean found it interesting as well. The full article is worth reproducing here, because it does present an issue that many Asian Americans consider to be significant.
SAT SCORES aren’t everything. But they can tell some fascinating stories.

Take 1,623, for instance. That’s the average score of Asian-Americans, a group that Daniel Golden - editor at large of Bloomberg News and author of “The Price of Admission’’ - has labeled “The New Jews.’’ After all, much like Jews a century ago, Asian-Americans tend to earn good grades and high scores. And now they too face serious discrimination in the college admissions process.

Notably, 1,623 - out of a possible 2,400 - not only separates Asians from other minorities (Hispanics and blacks average 1,364 and 1,276 on the SAT, respectively). The score also puts them ahead of Caucasians, who average 1,581. And the consequences of this are stark.
Princeton sociologist Thomas Espenshade, who reviewed data from 10 elite colleges, writes in “No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal’’ that Asian applicants typically need an extra 140 points to compete with white students. In fact, according to Princeton lecturer Russell Nieli, there may be an “Asian ceiling’’ at Princeton, a number above which the admissions office refuses to venture.
Emily Aronson, a Princeton spokeswoman, insists “the university does not admit students in categories. In the admission process, no particular factor is assigned a fixed weight and there is no formula for weighing the various aspects of the application.’’

A few years ago, however, when I worked as a reader for Yale’s Office of Undergraduate Admissions, it became immediately clear to me that Asians - who constitute 5 percent of the US population - faced an uphill slog. They tended to get excellent scores, take advantage of AP offerings, and shine in extracurricular activities. Frequently, they also had hard-knock stories: families that had immigrated to America under difficult circumstances, parents working as kitchen assistants and store clerks, and households in which no English was spoken.
But would Yale be willing to make 50 percent of its freshman class Asian? Probably not.
Indeed, as Princeton’s Nieli suggests, most elite universities appear determined to keep their Asian-American totals in a narrow range. Yale’s class of 2013 is 15.5 percent Asian-American, compared with 16.1 percent at Dartmouth, 19.1 percent at Harvard, and 17.6 percent at Princeton.
“There are a lot of poor Asians, immigrant kids,’’ says University of Oregon physics professor Stephen Hsu, who has written about the admissions process. “But generally that story doesn’t do as much as it would for a non-Asian student. Statistically, it’s true that Asians generally have to get higher scores than others to get in.’’

In a country built on individual liberty and promise, that feels deeply unfair. If a teenager spends much time studying, excels at an instrument or sport, and garners wonderful teacher recommendations, should he be punished for being part of a high-achieving group? Are his accomplishments diminished by the fact that people he has never met - but who look somewhat like him - also work hard?

“When you look at the private Ivy Leagues, some of them are looking at Asian-American applicants with a different eye than they are white applicants,’’ says Oiyan Poon, the 2007 president of the University of California Students Association. “I do strongly believe in diversity, but I don’t agree with increasing white numbers over historically oppressed populations like Asian-Americans, a group that has been denied civil rights and property rights.’’ But Poon, now a research associate at the University of Massachusetts Boston, warns that there are downsides to having huge numbers of Asian-Americans on a campus.

In California, where passage of a 1996 referendum banned government institutions from discriminating on the basis of race, Asians make up about 40 percent of public university students, though they account for only 13 percent of residents. “Some Asian-American students feel that they lost something by going to school at a place where almost half of their classmates look like themselves - a campus like UCLA. The students said they didn’t feel as well prepared in intercultural skills for the real world.’’

But what do you do if you’re an elite college facing tremendous numbers of qualified Asian applicants? At the 2006 meeting of the National Association for College Admission Counseling, a panel entitled “Too Asian?’’ looked at the growing tendency of teachers, college counselors, and admissions officers to see Asians as a unit, rather than as individuals.

Hsu argues it’s time to tackle this issue, rather than defer it, as Asians’ superior performance will likely persist. “This doesn’t seem to be changing. You can see the same thing with Jews. They’ve outperformed other ethnic groups for the past 100 years.’’

Which leaves us with two vexing questions: Are we willing to trade personal empowerment for a more palatable group dynamic? And when - if ever - should we give credit where credit is due?
Do Colleges Redline Asian-Americans? (Boston Globe)

As the article described, Asian Americans present a dilemma to colleges. In practically every objective admission criterion colleges tend to examine, Asian Americans destroy the field. At this point, even the Asian American stereotype of “math genius but not well-rounded student” is outdated. Asian Americans parents have long since figured out and adjusted their educational emphasis to what the elite colleges demand. The new generation of Asian American college applicants are modeled after Dr. Jim Yong Kim, the current president of Dartmouth College. They are class presidents and varsity quarterbacks on top of being valedictorians.

 
Dr. Jim Yong Kim, a.k.a. "Every Korean Mother's Dream"

So Asian Americans have high test scores and GPAs. Their extracurricular activities are excellent. They have shown leadership qualities. They often do this while being at a substantial disadvantage in terms of family wealth and other background, such as overcoming the language and cultural barrier. In other words, there is no “objective” way for a college to refuse an Asian American applicant, other than drawing a blatant – if unspoken – red line that limits the number of Asian Americans, simply by virtue of their race. Is this a good thing?

You might be surprised, because the Korean actually does think it is a good thing.

First of all, allow the Korean to first state his preferred end result: meritocracy must be an important element in college admissions. The meritocracy must involve clearly stated criteria such as test scores, quality of extracurricular activities, quality of letters of recommendation, and so on. And the Korean is not advocating that college campuses mirror exactly the local or national racial mix. There must be some sort of middle ground. The Korean does not know where the proper middle ground is. But the middle ground is probably not the 55 percent Asian American campus as it is in University of California, Irvine.

To explain why the Korean thinks so, allow the Korean to quote John Dewey: “Education is not a preparation for life; education is life itself.” Because the Korean experienced two drastically different educational systems (Korean and American,) the truth of Dewey’s quote resonates even stronger with him. In fact, many of Korean educational system’s flaws (despite its numerous strengths) can be traced to this: Korea treats its schools as a place where students prepare for the real world, as opposed to treating it as the real world in and of itself. Thus, learning knowledge is emphasized, while learning social skills gets a short shrift.

The same principle must apply to colleges. College is not a meal ticket given for a certain set of “good behaviors”. It is a place where one receives education. And if colleges do not adequately reflect the “life itself” as Dewey said, they cannot provide adequate education.

 
Education that solely relies upon what is taught in the classrooms is incomplete at best.
(Not that Columbia University, pictured here, has anything to do with that.)

And the inescapable feature of American life is that Americans constantly deal with other Americans who can be very different from them. This difference need not be racial or cultural. The difference can originate from geography, social class, gender, sexual orientation, or any old thing. However, to ignore the need to handle racial and cultural differences in American life is to put blinders on one’s eyes. And obviously, the skill of handling racial and cultural differences in American life will not come solely through classroom education, if it comes at all in that manner. Students need to learn this skill simply by being around people who are drastically different from them.

Obviously, the differences that need to be represented cannot only be racial. Colleges (especially elite ones) must strive to replicate to some degree – not exactly, mind you – the larger American society in every manner. It needs to have geographical representation, wealth representation, sexual orientation representation, you name it. The more difference elite college students encounter, the better education they will receive.

The Korean draws this conclusion from his own experience. He is firmly convinced that University of California, Berkeley is the place that made him the person that he is today. Berkeley did so by providing a very diverse student body. For the first time in his life, the Korean met someone from Decatur, Alabama – the home of the second largest Wal-Mart in the world, according to him. A former amateur boxer who started college at age 25. A blind person who ended up becoming a school tour guide by memorizing the script in Braille and walking backwards with her cane pointing the other direction. A future NFL starting quarterback. An heiress who has a building on campus named after her family. Meeting and interacting with them gave the Korean a much more nuanced appreciation of the country and the world in which he lived.

 
The greatest college in the world.

One of the Korean’s favorite college memories is this: The Korean was friends with a charismatic deaf person who ended up serving as the Executive Vice President of the student government that oversees over 30,000 students. His friend was such a socially adept smooth talker that, other than the hearing aid on his ears and his pitchless voice typical of a deaf person, the Korean hardly noticed that his friend was much different from him.

One day, the Korean went to the beach with his friends. After dark, we set a bonfire, sat around it and talked. Because the fire was hot on his face, the Korean spoke with his two hands cupped around the lower part of his face, without thinking much about it. But whenever the Korean talked, the Korean’s friend waved his hand at the Korean, as if he was brushing something aside. The Korean did not understand. After a few seconds, finally another friend explained: “Justin can’t read your lips if you cover your face like that.”

It was a minor episode at the time, but somehow it stayed in the Korean’s mind. It was such a little thing that the Korean himself did not even perceive, but that little thing blocked out the entire communication for Justin. You would think that someone who moved from one country to another at age 16 would be able to appreciate the differences in radically different people. But the moment that stays with the Korean’s head had nothing to do with his experience of adjusting wholesale to a completely different culture. It had to do with his experience of something that was nearly imperceptible at the time but somehow resonated greater and greater until it became a personal philosophy-defining moment.

This is what education should be. Ideal education would provide everyone with this type of moment. Boston Globe columnist Kara Miller’s last question is a perfectly fair one: “When - if ever - should we give credit where credit is due?” The Korean does not know exactly where that line should be. But that is hardly a reason for not having a line. With help of research and experts, we engage in dicey line drawing all the time. (For example, why is the speed limit on some highways 65 mph, not 60 mph or 70 mph?) The line should be drawn at the point where Asian Americans students, like all other students, receive a meaningful education in living in a highly diverse society. And if meritocracy must take a less-than-100 percent role in the determination of who gets a chance to be educated in one of hundreds of elite universities in America, that’s how it should be.

After the jump, a couple of quick hitters that did not exactly fit anywhere.

Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.

Sunday, February 28, 2010

Ask a Korean! News: Korea's Bobsled Team

The Korean could not care less about the fuss about Korea's short track speed skating team. Arbitrary rules and falling down are part of the game people, let it go.

Instead, let us focus on the heartwarming story of Korea's bobsled team:

"Show Them We Can Do It"; The Miracle of the Four Bobsled Warriors

They held their hands. The heated energy channeled to every one. They could not even hear each other because of the crowd's passionate cheering. But perhaps because they focused solely on the game, only the quiet tension flowed among them. The eldest one spoke in low voice: "We prepared until we had no regret. Let's show them we can do it." His teammate silently nodded, exchanging determined glares.

Kang Gwang-Bae, driver. (37 years old, Team Gangwon-do Province.) He was an alpine skier during college, but he bet his career on a road less traveled after a critical ACL rupture -- He switched to luge, a sled. At the time in Korea, there was no other luge player, no equipment, no support. His only weapon was his unwavering perseverance. Solely with this pioneering spirit, he stood tall in his entry into 1998 Nagano Winter Olympics. He entered as a skeleton player for Salt Lake City in 2002 and Torino in 2006. This time in Vancouver Winter Olympics, he led the national team as the steady rock of an elder in four-man bobsled, the premier event of sledding. He is the first in the world to enter into Olympics in all three sledding events.

Kim Dong-Hyeon, brakeman. (23, Yonsei University.) Bobsled seems simple, but it is a very sensitive game. Experience is crucial because the tiniest mistake drastically changes the rank. In a game that is said to require a decade to have any sense, the youngest Kim's experience is merely one year. Two years ago, he could barely carry a conversation because of congenital hearing disability. After recovering his hearing after surgery, he began bobsledding a year ago. He has now become the future of Korea's bobsledding. He has good physique -- 185 cm, 87 kg -- while being diligent and modest. He is expected to share the load that Kang used to carry alone.

Kim Jeong-Su, (29, Team Gangwon Province) and Lee Jin-Hee (26, Gangneung University), pushers. They were a weightlifter and a javelin thrower respectively by training, but gained a second life through bobsled. Kim said, "Weightlifting was so stressful I was losing hair. Bobsled is hard too, but it feels like I am regrowing hair." Lee said, "When I stand on the start line in Bobsled, all my nerves are shot because of tension. But after some time, I end up missing the thrill."

These four warriors played in the final race in the four-man bobsled, held on the 28th in Canada Whistler Sliding Center. The Whistler course is notorious as the "course of death" because of numerous accidents during practice, but the team engaged in an aggressive racing. Kang spoke with emotion: "Sledding down, all the memories of hardship flashed before my eyes. Thinking of my mother and wife, I cried without even knowing."

The result was 52.92 seconds. The cumulative time, adding all four heats, was 3 minutes 31.13 seconds -- good for 19th place. Team Korea, ranked 36th in the world, achieved a small miracle by ranking within top 20 in its first entry in the Olympics. Team Korea was also Asia's best, overtaking Team Japan (21st place) which had over 60 more years of history. Japan has more than 30 bobsled teams; Korea does not even have a bobsled track.

After the race, they hugged one another without a word. Something flowed from their eyes while quietly celebrating the achievement of their goals. Kang said, "I don't know why. Just looking at my teammates, the tears fell." But the joy is only temporary, as they were already looking ahead to four years later at Sochi. Kim Dong-Hyeon, gently stroking the sled like a jockey would a racehorse, said: "If we were only thinking about getting happy here, we would not even have started. Now we start again."

"할 수 있다는것 보여주자" 봅슬레이 4인 전사의 기적 (Dong-A Ilbo)

*                          *                           *

Bromance!! Accept it, men -- y'all choked up a little.

Got a question or comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.

Friday, February 26, 2010

New York Times article about Kim Yu-Na's victory:
So intense was the interest in the Kim-Asada rivalry that Korean reporters and photographers began arriving at the arena 12 hours before Thursday’s competition, only to find that some of their Japanese counterparts had spent the night at the rink.

...

“I think the whole nation is in front of the television,” said John Moon, chief of staff of the South Korean Olympic Committee. “Kim Yu-na is the country’s special sister. Every athlete is important, but her medal is more important than the others. She is beautiful. She’s our pride. I think Koreans will have a lot of drinks.
Oh those Koreans and their drinking. :)

As Kim Raises the Bar, South Korea Delights (New York Times)

Live Blogging Winter Olympics: February 25, 2010

Some more impressions...

- Ditched work early, came home at around 9:15 p.m. Was nearly blown away from the insane snow and wind. Did the Korean mention New York weather sucks?

- Damn near had a heart attack to find the DVR was not working. Fortunately, regular TV worked, and figure skating did not happen yet. In fact, it would not happen for more than an hour.

- Instead of watching Nordic Combined again, the Korean opts for California v. Arizona basketball on ESPN while having dinner. Menu: kimchi jjigae and pajeon, courtesy again from the Korean Mother.

- Bears own the Cats. Go Bears! Jerome Randle is a stud. Too bad we will be killed the moment we run into any team with interior size in the Tourney.

- Flip the channel right on time for figure skating. Time to get nervous.

- This is rare. NBC seems to know that Kim Yu-Na vs. Mao Asada is a big freakin' deal. The introduction plays this up to the max, showing cross-clips of Yu-Na and Asada and repeatedly mentioning how significant the "rivalry" is between Japan and Korea. The Korean is not sure if "rivalry" is the right term. Cal-Stanfurd is a rivalry. Kobe-LeBron is a rivalry. Korea-Japan... that's something else, whatever it is.

- A lady with a super long last name from Georgia takes the ice. Proceeds to fall four times during the show. Slightly comforted by the fact that Yu-Na probably won't be this bad.

- Shit. Did the Korean just jinx Yu-Na? Unthink! Unthink!

- Mao looks determined during warm-up. Yu-Na looks relaxed. Don't know which one is the good sign.

- Rachel Flatt takes the ice. Seems to do everything well. Somehow could not buy into her facial expression that was anything other than smiles.

- Apparently Flatt is going to Stanfurd. No wonder the facial expression is terrible.

- Ooh, Flatt got her jumps downgraded and does not even lead with better skaters ahead of her. Not good. Shouldn't have gone to Stanfurd.

- Ando Miki comes on with a hideous ancient Egyptian-themed dress. Half-expected the fashion police would swoop in on a Zamboni. Rare feat to be offensive with a costume that belongs to people who no longer exist.

- There is no energy in Ando's performance. The Korean thought maybe he was missing something, but the announcers immediately say that Ando is just "going through the motions." Well then.

- Yu-Na comes on. Apparently her pre-show routine includes cleaning boogers -- she did the same before the short program as well. Further proves that pretty girls can do basically anything in public and get away with it.

- Again, just don't fall. Please.

- The dominance of Yu-Na is really obvious. She goes into her jumps so fast that the entire routine appears much more natural. She also has the perfect physique with long limbs.

- Yes! No falling! Yu-Na is happy with herself, and the announcers are practically unconscious with praise. Now, the score...

- HOLY CRAP!! 150.06!!!!! 228.56 OVERALL!!!! EVEN YU-NA CAN'T BELIEVE IT!!! IT'S ALL OVER!!!!

- Salieri Charles Barkley Mao takes the ice.

- The Korean Mother: "She needs to play within herself and just do the best she can instead of trying to do more than that."

- Everything about Mao at this moment is about intensity. Music, dress, facial expression, everything. Even her smile looks like it could kill someone.

- Triple axel, and another one. Damn amazing, no matter how many times the Korean sees it.

- Disaster! Mao's skate gets caught in the ice, and she can't jump the way she intended to. Now it's really over.

- Mao waits for her score. The graphic says: "154.79 to lead." It looks ridiculous, as if someone told the Korean: "With only $ 59 billion, you will be richer than Bill Gates."

- Yu-Na leads Mao by TWENTY-THREE POINTS. Unbelievable. Just unbelievable.

- Joannie Rochette's turn. Don't remember anything about this. Still delirious from TWENTY-THREE POINTS.

- Mirai Nagasu comes on. Again with the single-lines-for-eyes smile, but now a little scary how she could go there from a look of serious intensity in an instant, on command.

- Nagasu has some of the qualities that make Yu-Na great. Smooth, artistic, a little bit of magnetism. She finishes fourth, and looks happy. She will be great in Sochi. U.S.A.! U.S.A.!

- It's official, Yu-Na is the champion. Tears of joy from Yu-Na. High-five between the Korean and the Korean Mother. The Korean Fiancee's victory text message: "228.56= Gold medal for Yu-Na Kim. I've never been so happy to be a Kim!!!!"

- Medal ceremony. Rochette looks happy. Mao looks pissed. Looked like she did not even want to touch Yu-Na when they hugged.

- Aegukga, until East Sea and Mt. Baekdu dries and wears down flat. Flags raised, Taegukki on top. Winning feels so great.

- Congratulations Yu-Na, and thank you. You did all of us proud.



Got a question or comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.

Once Again, Vote for LiNK!

Dear Korean,

I wanted to ask if you could urge your readers to vote for us every day this week at www.linkglobal.org. We've been stuck in 4th place and we only have one week left to place in the top 2. Sunday is the last day to vote.

An easy way to get the word out is through our facebook group and cause. Here are some links that make it easier:

http://linkglobal.org/pepsi/blog/?page_id=111

http://linkglobal.org/pepsi/blog/?p=204

http://linkglobal.org/pepsi/blog/?p=186

Esther L.


You heard the woman. Go vote!

Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.

Thursday, February 25, 2010

The Korean found this post on Truehoop about Omri Casspi, the first Israeli player in the NBA, to be very interesting. Korean Americans and American Jews are in a comparable situation -- while they call America home, they have a visceral connection with the places outside of America. The interplay between the two places, symbolized by athletes, is an interesting mirror into how a mind of an immigrant operates.

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Ask a Korean! Wiki: How Not to be an Arrogant American?

Dear Korean,

I am an American I am going to be living in Korea for a year. I don't want to be the arrogant American. I would like to learn and respect the local culture. What would you say is some of the most immediate things to know about the culture to get me started?

Ryan


Dear Ryan,

The Frenchman of Ask a Frenchman! was asked the exact same question, and his answer is excellent. Here it is in its entirety:

Let’s start with American students in France, especially in Paris…

First of all, let me insist on one point. Like in any other aspects, what you do gives a reputation to everyone in your country of origin, and sadly, the bad things you do always have a stronger impact than the good things you do. For example, if there’s a guy who’s a complete jerk in the metro, if he’s French, people will think “this guy is really a jerk” but if he’s American, people will think “this American is really a jerk” and that will be one more nail in the coffin of America reputation’s abroad. This obviously works in any country, America included, not just France.

If I took the example of the metro it’s not random. For some reason, most of American student jerkiness I witness in Paris happens in the metro, which is also the place where most French people will encounter American students in their daily life.

That being said, and like many other things in life and on this planet, it’s always the loud minority that’s going to give a reputation to the silent majority, because of course most Americans students in Paris (and more generally, abroad) are decent people, but it’s the few jerks that give a bad reputation to all the rest. Locals won’t even notice the other decent ones or will consider them as decent people, not decent Americans. Life is not fair, I know. So if you’re a student abroad, be aware of that, of your own behavior, but also of your friends’ behavior. If they start doing something stupid in public, don’t just laugh, but try to prevent them from doing it.

Why is it Americans students (even a minority) that always behave stupidly in public places though is still a mystery to me. Other foreign students usually behave normally most of the time. But yeah, for some Americans, abroad, especially Paris, is some sort of Neverland where nothing is real and everything is designed for their own entertainment, as if the US was an island floating on a planet-wide Disneyland. I don’t think we’ll ever be able to change that, at least not until most Americans realize that they’re no different from anybody else and that their country is just one among more than 200.

So, how do you do not to be stigmatized as a “stupid American student”? It’s not that hard really. Of course, not wearing sweat pants is a good start, but unless you have a good sense of (international) fashion, chances that your clothes give you away as American are pretty high.

The answer has to lie elsewhere. It simply is in your behavior. I dropped a few hints in the previous lines, but basically always remember that:

- You’re in the real world, not some sort of fantasy world.
- You represent your country, whether you like it or not.
- Don’t do anything you wouldn’t do at home.
- Don’t do many of the things you would do at home.
- Basically do as Romans do, but also as Parisians do.
- But don’t try to appear or act French, you’ll fail (one of the funniest thing I can see in Paris is American students sitting at a café terrace, with a glass of wine and a cigarette just waiting as if something magical was gonna happen… hints: if you don’t smoke at home don’t pretend to do so in Paris, don’t drink wine in a café, wine is mostly consumed during meals, not in cafés).
- Be respectful of people you know, but also people you don’t know, you’ve never seen and you’ll never see again.
- Be respectful of yourself, don’t make a fool of yourself… ever…
- Don’t speak that loud. Americans don’t always realize that the “normal” volume of their voice is considered “loud” according to French standards. I know it’s hard to change such a thing that is so unconscious, but try nonetheless.
- Be friendly but not too friendly.
- And finally and most important, don't see the place as "abroad" but as "your current home".
Substitute "Paris" with "Seoul", and the vast majority of the Frenchman's advice applies to Korea as well.

The Korean will add one thing. Do as the best Koreans do, not as any Koreans do. One of the most common misguided complaint by an expat in Korea is: "Koreans do it too! Why can't I do it?" For example, there are plenty of Korean young men who get plastered on weekends, yell and pass out in the middle of the street. But that is not an excuse for you to do the same. Like it or not, for every negative action, you will be judged more harshly than Koreans who engaged in the same negative action. That's what it is like to live as a minority and an outsider. Your fellow Americans of color have been dealing with the same thing for years and years. Remember that, during Hurricane Katrina, black people "looted" food while white people "found" food? It is not fair, but it is to be expected.

But this post is categorized as a Wiki, and for a good reason. At the end of the day, the Korean has never really been an American in Korea in the truest sense. Therefore, he does not know the most common pitfalls that someone who is visiting Korea for the first time.

Readers, please contribute. Any small thing is fine.

Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.

Live Blogging Winter Olympics: February 23, 2010

Below are some of the Korean's impressions.

- The Korean Mother visited from Los Angeles, and we nearly forgot about the Winter Olympics while unpacking. Fortunately, the Korean Fiancee DVR'd the whole thing. She's the best. At 8:30 p.m., we are only 30 minutes behind the coverage.

- Cheltzee Lee, a daughter of a Chinese man and an African American woman, now representing Australia in figure skating. Globalization is awesome. She does very well.

- Women's bobsled. They should call those uniforms 민망 수트. The ladies' calf muscles are bigger than the Korean's head.

- The sleds look totally awesome, especially the American one. The Korean wants a car painted like that.

- NBC shows Yu-Na falling in practice this morning. She looks surprised after the fall, as if she's thinking: "This could happen to me?" The Korean is getting nervous.

- Mirai Nagasu, a Japanese American takes the ice, representing America in figure skating. Go immigrants. Go make America better.

- Nagasu's smile is very cute and super funny. Her eyes turn into a single line just like Japanese cartoons. She does well also, although going triple-double instead of triple-triple was a little disappointing. She also has a bloody nose.

- Pause in action, as the Korean must make a quick run to the nearby supermarket to pick up potatoes for the Korean Mother's superb 닭도리탕.

- Buy potatoes. Run back in the rain. New York weather blows.

- Women's ski cross. Ski cross is totally underrated. It's like short track with skis -- super fast, and disaster lurking in every corner.

- Holy crap! a French woman wipes out after a jump! I love this sport!

- Now they are showing the concerned daughter of the skier. The Korean feels like an ass. Local girl from Whistler wins the gold. Americans not even in the final round. Come on, America.

- 닭도리탕 is ready. Nordic combined skiing comes on. Perfect timing to not watch.

- Done eating, Americans lose to Austria in Nordic combined after leading the whole way. Come on.

- Men's giant slalom. Bode quits in the middle. Weak sauce, Bode. Meanwhile, the Korean quits pretending to help loading the dishwasher.

- Yes, finally! Mao Asada comes on. She looks good. Good music too.

- Triple axel... nails it.

- Audience is clapping to her music while the announcers keep quiet and let the moment speak for itself. Great sign for Mao.

- Yu-Na stands in the background. Hope she isn't getting nervous. Mao has been perfect so far.

- Crap. That was so good. 73.78 -- apparently a ten point improvement over her best performance this season. The Korean's hats off to Mao; the great ones rise to the ocassion. How are we going to beat that?

- Yu-Na comes on. Please, just don't fall.

- Good jump, good jump... whew, no falling...

- Bond theme comes on. Oh, the gun...

- Yu-Na is sexier than Mao. That will be the difference. The announcer notes her "sensuality" also.

- Yu-Na aims, shoots, and owns everyone's hearts. Magnificent. This will be close...

- THIS WASN'T CLOSE AT ALL!!!!!!! 78.50!!!!! YU-NA OWNS IT!!!!! NEW WORLD RECORD!!!!! NEARLY 5 POINTS BETTER THAN MAO!!!!!!!

- Immediately update Facebook. Met with protests from West Coasters who were just beginning to watch. Blame the NBC, and be glad that you are not running out to get potatoes in the rain.

- Suzuki Akiko comes on. Not nearly as good as Yu-Na nor Mao.

- Suzuki sits down and waits for her score. The graphics say "78.51 to lead." That's absurd. Like anyone can do that.

- Joannie Rochette comes on. Only one that is even in the same league as Yu-Na and Mao at this point. The Korean only knew that her mother passed away just a few days ago after the fact. What a performance.

- Long day at work tomorrow; gotta sleep.

As a bonus, here is a video of Kim Yu-Na's Nike commercial running in Korea.


Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Ask a Korean! News: Currency Reform in North Korea (Part 1)

As always, Mr. Joo Seong-Ha brings the latest news about North Korea -- this time, about the recent currency reform. Mr. Joo made this post in two parts, and the Korean will do the same. Part 2 will come later.

*                           *                           *

Currency Reform and the State of North Korea in 2010

I wrote this article on January 5, about a month after the currency reform in North Korea. Nearly two months have passed since, and right now there are many parts of the situation that are very different compared to early January. Despite that, I think it is meaningful to understand North Korea and compare the projection and the reality.

Yesterday, there are articles that say North Korean regime completely permitted marketplaces, and it also nullified the ban against foreign currency use. Given the initiative, I thought North Korea would at least hold out until February, but North Korea was much weaker than I thought. I added further explanation behind the * mark in places where the projection and the current reality differ.

--------------------------------

On November 30 of last year, the news of North Korea's sudden currency reform broke. Since then, the news of the currency reform's progress would fly from North to South every minute. Observing this currency reform, I really thought the times have changed.

North Korea actually reformed its currency in 1992 as well. But there is little known in South Korea about the situation at that time. But this time, the numerous North Korean cell phones connected to North Korea-related NGOs are fully engaged. Countless calls must be being made from North Korea to South Korea as we speak. This change only took 17 years. In the age of 18,000 North Korean defectors, the curtain secrecy that North Korea has so strenuously controlled no longer has any power.

This currency reform is not merely a reform of currency. Through currency, North Korea attempted to put the social system that had been derailed from the socialist ideology back on the old track, and nullify people's wealth created through market economy. Therefore, this reporter does not think "currency reform" is not the appropriate term. But in this article, rather than making up a strange term, I will continue to use "currency reform" as it has been customarily reported in the media.

This round of currency reform is based on the same idea as the currency reform in 1992. In July 1992, North Korean regime suddenly issued a directive that each family would receive new currency up to 300 North Korean won, and the rest should be deposited. Few expected this reform. New money, held in the province offices, were distributed. The money was not printed in North Korea; it was printed in Eastern Europe several months ago and sneaked into North Korea. Later, it was rumored that the money was printed in Czech Republic. The secret trains that carried the money to Pyongyang moved to each province capital under strict security. It took about half a month from the moment the money arrived from abroad to the moment when the currency reform was announced. Those who were involved in the transportation of money moved under the prison-like control, unable to go home for security reasons.

Although the regime only promised to exchange 300 won, there was no strong resistance. The amount is worth three months' salary, considering that average laborer earned around 100 won on average. At that time, North Korean currency had some value. If one reported to the workplace, one received rations. Of course, there were times when the rationing stopped for months in late 1980s in certain areas in northern North Korea. But seeing North Korea as a  whole, people could receive 1 kg of rice for 8 jeon from the ration center. 8 jeon is a discounted price from the government, and the actual price of rice in the market was around 3 to 4 won. Liquor and meat would be rationed on holidays; 1 kg of pork would be around 7 won.

Given that North Korea has no unemployment, currency reform did not directly affect everyday life because the workplace continued to provide salary and ration. There was also not much resistance because the regime made families to deposit money in excess of 300 won with a bank. Problem was that they could not withdraw the money later. It took several years for North Koreans to realize that they had been deceived by their government. Also, because the markets were not active at the time, there were very few people who were sitting on a very large amount of North Korean money -- usually Chinese Koreans or Japanese Koreans in North Korea.

The currency reform that provided only 300 won per family was faithful to the socialist concept of equality, as everyone starts with the same amount of money. For all these reasons, the currency reform at the time passed over without much resistance, and the impact of currency reform on North Korean economy was negligible.

Perhaps because of that sweet memory, North Korea implemented an egalitarian measure this time just like 1992. The regime made each family change 100,000 won in old money into 1,000 won in new money, redenominating its currency by 100 to 1. Also, each family, rich or poor, received 100,000 won from the government.

But 2009 is fundamentally different from 1992. As the regime could not provide ration since mid-1990s, North Koreans have been relying solely on the marketplace. In 2009, nearly 15 years since, there is a massive difference in the wealthy and the poor. Currency reform fell like a bolt of lightning on people who were sitting on a large amount of money, relegating them to the same amount of money as their neighbors who were living day-by-day. The regime is telling people to deposit money in excess of 100,000 won, but North Koreans at this point know from experience that money in the bank is not theirs. Of course, a rich family did not completely fall to an equal plane as their neighbors, as they own nice houses, expensive electronics and foreign currency. But broadly speaking, the wealth differential among people has been reduced.

Because of that, many North Koreans support this currency reform. The greatest supporters are the class of people who continued to report to a workplace as the regime told them to -- which includes laborers, farmers and intellectuals. (*Note -- this group supported the currency reform as of early January, but around late January they turned into a strongly dissatisfied group, as food became scarce because inflation rose murderously and the market disappeared.)

This group had no choice but to report to their workplace even though they may have preferred to work at a market, because various punishments such as forced labor awaited them if they did not report. But there are few who receive ration from their workplace. They would receive about 3,000-4,000 won in monthly salary, a pittance that can barely buy 2 kg of rice. Those who report to work could not help but become jealous and envious of those who accumulate wealth through market while giving all kinds of excuses not to report to work.

As the same laborers mere 10 years ago have separated into the rich and the poor today, the sense of deprivation grew among those who lost out, which led to the dissatisfaction with the system. Workers would often complain that they no longer knew if North Korea was a capitalist society or a social society. But this round of currency reform sacrificed the class of people who accumulated wealth from the market. It is natural that the anger of this class, who lost their hard-earned money in an instant, rose sky-high. In other words, a class of strongly dissatisfied group is born in North Korea. But of course, there is little possibility that their anger would lead to collective resistance.

On the other hand, the workers strongly welcomed the measure, calling it long overdue. They also enjoy a certain measure of schadenfreude over the people whose money was confiscated. Retired pensioners also welcome this policy. Pensioners' purchasing power is greatly enhanced -- with their pension of around 1,000 won per month, they can now buy over 10 kg of corn instead of 1 kg. (*Note -- as of now in late February, about 4 kg of corn.) Of course the purchasing power would drop as inflation worsens, but as of now it is true that the purchasing power for workers and pensioners has been greatly enhanced. (*As of late February the purchasing power of a monthly salary is still higher compared to pre-currency reform, but the speed of inflation is beyond imagination.) Riding on the wave of this support, North Korean regime is trying to implement the second stage of the currency reform, curbing the wealthy class that purchased expensive houses with foreign currency. (*Only attempted, not actually implemented.)

It must be noted that right after the currency reform, the regime designated January 8, the birthday for Kim Jong-Un (the third son of Kim Jong-Il,) as a holiday. This is to induce the implication that under Kim Jong-Un's rule, there will be policies for the people. The current situation, where the regime is enjoying favorable popular opinion for the first time in a while thanks to the currency reform, could be the best opportunity for the regime to naturally inform people of the third-generation succession plan. From this perspective, the currency reform could be the regime's sophisticated plan to prepare for the third-generation succession. (*But now its failure is utterly exposed.)

There are another reason for the currency reform other than the realization of egalitarianism and preparing for the succession -- to restore the regime's control by resurrecting the planned economy and recapturing the human resources, scattered into the market, back to the structure. On the surface level, this could be the most important reason for the currency reform.

So far, there has been no circulation of currency where the money issued by the government would return to the government's bank. No matter how much money was printed, the money would immediately go into the coffers of the merchants and would not come out. Of course this is because banks lost credibility by not returning money that was deposited. The regime continued to pour water into a bottomless jar by continuing to print money, which led to serious inflation. There are also rumors that the Chinese organized criminals are circulating counterfeit North Korean money in a large scale, although this rumor is hard to verify. Because of these factors, North Korea instantly turned the money it issued into scrap paper through currency reform.

For some time going forward, the regime's power will become greater, as it has the authority to issue money. In order to induce laborers to return to the workplace, North Korea began paying the same face value of salary in the new currency. Because of this measure, it is expected that the currency reform would somewhat recover the regime's control over its people. (*Because the regime surrendered to the market forces much faster than expected, the restoration of control over people hardly occurred.)

But it is a stretch to think that the support for the currency reform would lead to some level of revival for North Korean economy. In order for the success of planned economy through the currency reform, the supply of goods must follow -- a critical condition. The regime's calculation is to have people return to the workplace and produce goods, inject those goods to the government's supply system and have them purchased by the people -- in other words, restoration of the socialist economic circulation.

But now, even if the workers show up to their workplace, they cannot work because they have no raw material. In other words, the success of the currency reform depends on North Korea's ability to provide raw material to its factories and companies. (*Now, it is being proven that the currency reform began without such ability, which doomed the currency reform from the start.)

In addition to the production raw material procurement issue, another important issue is the ability to circulate goods through the government-controlled networks instead of marketplace. This is so because that ability would create the money circulation that goes through the government's banks instead of the merchants' pockets. Considering this, it is being said that North Korean regime had imported a large quantity of goods from China and sold them through the government-controlled stores just before the currency reform. Some say that China's leftover inventory created by the global financial crisis is now coming into North Korea in the form of aid.

But the regime's importation of goods has a limit. Right now it can barely fill some number of stores in Pyongyang. (*As of February the limitation has been proven -- even the Pyongyang stores no longer receive supplies.) In order to control outside of Pyongyang, the North Korean regime is trying to close the mega-marketplaces which served wholesalers within the next few month, and force the goods to be sold through the government-controlled supply chain. (*Currently these attempts have been fruitless.)

In other words, the second round of the fight against the existing market forces has begun. But the merchants, severely damaged by the currency reform, are not following the regime's orders. They know from experience that the market forces never benefit by following what the regime told them to do. The so-called "big hands" of the market, namely the suppliers of goods necessary for North Korean life, are sitting on their goods since the currency reform, observing the situation. One big reason is that they cannot figure out the appropriate price after the currency reform since the price has been violently fluctuating. They are also calculating that over time, the price of goods will increase. (*The merchants are sitting out even after three months since the currency reform, and the prices are skyrocketing as they expected.)

As the "big hands" stopped supplying goods, scarcity is occurring in all areas. There are also families who starve because rice is not being supplied. (*There are rumors of starvation deaths by late January.) Mindful of the scarcity, the regime rationed some amount of food to the people, but the ration was a one-time event. The regime is also making an effort to sell the goods that it procured through government-run stores; in other words, the regime itself is trying to take the role that the market "big hands" used to play. But already there is evidence that the regime is overmatched. There are few who believe that the regime can continue even this level of effort for more than a few months. (*In fact, it could not even hold on for one month.)

One "big hand" of North Korea said in a call in January, "I can't send the goods to the market, so I can only wait for the right time while having three warehouses full of grain and goods." It is probable that every warehouse in North Korea is full of goods which the merchants are sitting on like this. They are waiting for the moment when the government withdraws and the price escalates rapidly. (*The situation is the same today.) The regime may be taking the place of the merchants today, but the merchants will take back their place when the regime is defeated in this role. (*As late February the regime raised the white flag, but the merchants did not reassume their role because the market price is too volatile. To date, North Korea's marketplace has no master, and the chaos will reign for the time being.)

This situation is providing a hope that the currency reform, implemented for the purpose of restoring the planned economy, ironically can serve as a catalyst for further international openness from North Korea. This is so because it is likely that North Korean regime, in order to match the market forces, will rely foreign relations in order to supply the goods. In fact, this is the only choice for the North Korea to avoid defeat from the market forces. If the regime loses here, there is no guarantees that the system can survive. (*This hypothesis is proving to be true to a certain extent. There are signs of North Korean desperation, such as the establishment of a developmental bank or rumors of a plan to raise $1 billion in foreign investment.)

It is very meaningful that on December 17 of last year, Chairman Kim Jong-Il visited the northern city of Rajin-Seonbong and that the Supreme People's Council Standing Committee issued a directive that said, "Ra-Seon city will be designated as a special district." Attempting to resurrect the Rajin-Seonbong free economy and trade zone, which had been practically dead, belies the intent to host foreign investment. North Korea has amply learned the lesson that foreign investment does not come in only because the regime wants it to come. The fact that the regime is willing to start again by designating Rajin-Seonbong as a special district despite that lesson may imply that North Korea is ready to yield to the international community. (*In early February, there was a report that North Korea will designate ten more special economic zone in addition.)

It must also be noted that since the new year, North Korea is leaking remarks that appear to foreshadow an inter-Korea summit meeting. Because the regime set light industry and agriculture as the most important task, it would try its best to produce results that can be shown to the people. Also, there is a possibility that Chairman Kim Jong-Il will visit China and receive a massive aid in exchange for responding to a demand related to the six-party talk, that North Korea would receive a groundbreaking economic aid through inter-Korea summit, or that North Korea would normalize relations with Japan and receive a large amount of compensation for the past history. Of course, any of the choices above requires a bold determination from North Korea. (*Measures like these will be presented when North Korean regime's ability to maintain its system is at the brink, but it has not yet come that far.)

--Continued in Part 2--

Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.
Apropos of nothing...
There were two candidates in an election. Total of 2.8 million votes were cast. Candidate I earned 28,000 more votes than Candidate II. All votes were either for Candidate I or Candidate II. What percentage of the total votes did Candidate I earn?
The Korean volunteers as an SAT tutor for a 10th grader who gets As and Bs. (The Korean reviews his students' grade sheets himself.) In the 30 minutes that the Korean and the student spent on the question above, the student --

- could not understand that Candidate I earned 14,000 more votes than 50 percent.
- did not know how many zeroes there were in 2.8 million.
- could not subtract 28,000 from 2.8 million without a calculator.
- could not convert "Candidate I earned 28,000 more votes than Candidate II" to "x = y + 28,000".
- could not solve for x and y with the two equations "x + y = 2,800,000" and "x = y + 28,000".
- could not divide 2,772,000 by two without a calculator.

Again, the Korean's 10th grader student gets As and Bs. An average 5th grader in Korea could solve this problem. Math education in New York City public school system is criminal.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...